The goal of pedagogy

When i was studying at university, one of my professors liked to say that the goal of pedagogy in itself is to make itself redundant and not necessary anymore...

I understand why he said it, as the goal of education in general is usually looked as helping people to become independent,  and to be able to lead their live independently.

But! Society keeps changing, and so should the goals of education and pedagogy, shouldn't they? In a society where everything is in constant change, it has to help people to learn how to get along with the change, and how to find stability with it. In a society that is rather stable, it can encourage people to go out and explore, and to go out of their comfort zones.

Education has to adapt to the current needs of a society, while also taking into account how things might change in the future. Especially when it is about educating children!

I think the main point why pedagogy might have a goal of making itself obsolete, is that everyone should learn how to adapt to changes and different situations, and 'learning how to learn'. But even this is something that has to be taught!

Pedagogical situations happen everywhere, between all kind of people, not only with students and teachers. So that it one day should not be needed anymore, is kind of an utopian idea, I think. 

Is anything really truly "ours"?

While this question obviously is not being asked in everyday life, still it can give a good starting point to think about the value of possessions and we define as "mine" and "yours" or "theirs" and "ours". So let me just give this little trail of thoughts, and let you decide where it leads to:

That favorite book/DVD/game that lies there in your shelf...is it really truly yours? Sure you bought it with money, but you didn't really make it by yourself, right? Neither did you produce the money nor the DVD. You worked so you could get the money that has been produced (mainly by machines), to buy something that has been produced (mainly by machines). And if you have the knowledge to make the book? Well, then you still have to get the paper that someone else made. If you can make the paper by yourself too, you still have to cut down the tree, not to mentioned the materials for the needed tools. And before the tree can grow to the size where it can be used to make paper, first has to be planted. And so on. In the end, close to everything that we one we have thanks to the common effort of several people involved.

So when children are starting to learn the conceptions of 'mine' and 'yours', what should they actually be taught? Of course it is accepted that toys they bring from home are theirs, and they can decided who can play with it. On the same time, it is simply assumed and requested that the toys at kindergarten are those of everyone, with no specific child as an owner! Especially at the beginning time, when coming newly into such a group, a child can be confused about it. Everything was their own, so why is it not the way now? Oh it's not mine, then just let me break it, if it's not mine, no one can have it! (Unfortunately, there are even adult who still have this way of thought)

Maybe instead of teaching about ownership and rules concerning it, it would be more important and appropriate to start off with showing and teaching that every living being and object has to be treated with care and respect! If we knew and trusted that the other side also uses our items with care, we might be inclined to share it much easier.

Eventually, such kind of understanding also might help with the discussions about digital ownership, rights to ideas, concepts and inventions, etc.